dcfadv.com · Government and public-health agencies running social/behavior-change campaigns (vaccine promotion, mental health, tobacco cessation, civic/voter engagement, food/housing insecurity) — not general commercial marketing clients
Each of these was found by the tool and then confirmed by fetching that company's own live page on 2026-09-07. If one of them is wrong, that is worth thirty seconds of your time to tell me — it is the most useful thing in this report.
A 100%-employee-owned, GSA-schedule behavior-change marketing firm building data-driven public-health campaigns (tobacco, opioid, marijuana, nutrition, alcohol) for government agencies and health departments.
A 50-year branding/advertising/PR firm built around behavior-change campaigns for federal health and public agencies (CDC, SAMHSA, NIH, SSA, DoD, USDA), not commercial clients.
A 50+ year DC agency doing behavior-change and health communications (CDC among named clients) with a dedicated multicultural outreach service line — same buyer and same campaign type (public-health/behavior-change to diverse audiences) as DCF Advertising.
A read, not a measurement.
dcfadv.com opens with "We're a full-service creative agency passionate about improving health outcomes and driving positive social and behavioral change," and the About page opens with "For 25 years, we've passionately dedicated ourselves to improving health, driving positive change, and making a meaningful impact on the world." Crosby's homepage instead says it works "through four specialized practice areas" and puts all four in the navigation — Healthcare, Nonprofits & Causes, Government, Military & Veterans. Hager Sharp's homepage says "For decades we have been developing strategies to successfully communicate important disease prevention and health promotion information to diverse audiences of consumers, health care professionals, patients, educators, scientists, and many others." Rescue opens on method: "There is no one-size-fits-all strategy to changing health behaviors. We approach every challenge through a data-driven lens." From the outside, a procurement officer reading four homepages sees three firms that say who they answer to, and one that says how it feels about the work.
Your clearest statement to a federal buyer is on /fed: DCF "creates high-impact multichannel ad campaigns and communication programs to service the unique needs of federal government agencies," and "DCF is a proven Small Business government contractor and GSA professional service provider." We checked the five main pages of dcfadv.com — home, About, Work, Services and /fed itself — and found zero links pointing to /fed. The GSA contract number sits in the footer, but the page that makes the federal argument is reachable only by typing the URL. Rescue puts "GSA Status" in its top navigation. Crosby makes Government one of four nav practice areas. Hager Sharp puts "Contract Vehicles" in the footer of every page as a link. A read: three competitors treat the federal buyer as a front door; your site treats that buyer as someone who already knows where to look.
Rescue sells methods with names and marks on them — its footer reads "Social Branding ® and Evolvement ® are registered trademarks," and its navigation carries Decision Blocks, Policy 360, SAVI Messaging and licensable Ready-Made Campaigns. Crosby brands its positioning line "Inspiring Actions That Matter" with a trademark symbol on the homepage. Your services page describes the same work in general terms — "We excel in developing impactful campaigns by merging passion and creativity with strategic expertise to tackle diverse challenges" — and we found no trademark or registered mark anywhere across your five main pages or your team page. From the outside it reads like they are selling something a buyer can ask for by name, and you are selling attributes a buyer has to take on trust.
Counted from published pages on both sides.
We pulled every one of the 57 campaign pages linked from dcfadv.com/our-work and read the text of each. 56 carry a "MEDIA:" line, 56 carry a "LANGUAGES:" line, 2 carry a "PRESS:" line, and 0 of the 57 contain a figure written as a number followed by %, "percent", "million" or "billion". We ran the identical scan across Hager Sharp's 13 case studies (6 carry one) and Crosby's 12 (5 carry one). Crosby's SSA page alone ends with six: 4.9 million website visits, 2.1 billion impressions, 13 million new accounts, cost-per-acquisition down 87%, conversion up 100%, $21 million in earned media. Hager Sharp's HPV page reports vaccination rates moving from 42% to 63% in males and 60% to 69% in females, plus 617 million impressions.
The "OUR CLIENTS" section of your About page holds 18 logo images. The alt text on every one of them is the image filename — including "images.png", "unnamed.jpg", "download.png" and "placeholder.jpg" — so no client is named in text on that page. Across all 57 case studies, the word "client" appears 0 times. Rescue publishes a /clients page that names 18 organisations as plain text, from the FDA Center for Tobacco Products to the Vermont Department of Health. All 12 of Crosby's case studies are titled for the client (SSA, HRSA, VHA, DAV, Kaiser Permanente, Military OneSource, Energy Star, Wallace Foundation and four more). All 13 of Hager Sharp's are too (CDC three times, USDA twice, AARP Foundation, US Department of Education and six more). Same count of logos, opposite result: 18 named on their side, 0 named on yours.
Your header offers 4 destinations: ABOUT, WORK, SERVICES and Let's Talk. Crosby's header offers 18 across three menus. Rescue's offers 11, including Research, Webinars and Resources. Hager Sharp's offers 8. We also read all 84 URLs in your sitemap.xml and found no blog, news, insights or research destination among them. Rescue's blog landing page currently shows 7 posts under 3 named bylines. Crosby runs a News and Views section with a named press contact on the page. Hager Sharp, to be fair, publishes no blog either — so this is two of the three, not three of three.
The two or three things that would be visible to a buyer comparing you side by side.
You hold GSA contract 47QRAA23D004A, a SAM UEI, a CAGE code, a capability statement PDF, and a Client Relations Manager whose bio says she "specializes in federal contract management" and "excels at... navigating the complexities of government contracts." The capability statement is linked only from /fed, and /fed is linked from none of your five main pages. Her bio is on /our-team-1, which is also linked from none of them. Hager Sharp's Contract Vehicles page lists 6 contract numbers, each with its period of performance and the agency behind it — a CDC health marketing BPA, an FDA food-safety BPA, and four more. Crosby's Government page lists GSA MAS, OASIS+, an NIH PICS III IDIQ and an 8(a) mentor-protégé joint venture with its own schedule, alongside a named practice leader, Anna Zawislanski, MPH, EVP, and the line "More than 94% of our CPARS ratings are 'Exceptional' or 'Very Good'." A buyer comparing the four would see the same class of credential on all four sites and be able to find it on three.
We compared your sitemap against every link on your five main pages. 22 of the 84 URLs are linked from none of them — including /fed, /reel, /samples, /mhreport, and /our-team-1, which carries 7 named leaders with full bios: John Fortune, Jim DeAngelo, Lizzy Kitces, Agatha Rybicki, Amanda Villiez, Jennifer Gilman and Jenya Lugina, with tenures running back to 2000, 2003, 2004 and 2010. Crosby's People page, one click from any page on their site, names 15 people with titles. From the outside it reads like the proof a buyer needs to trust a 25-year firm — the founder, the tenure, the federal contracts manager — is all written and all unpublished.
Across your 57 case studies, 56 carry a LANGUAGES line, 51 name more than one language, and 24 distinct languages appear in total — Spanish, Mandarin, Cantonese, Haitian Creole, Bengali, Urdu, Yiddish, Polish, Arabic, Russian, Korean, Ukrainian, and Garifuna, Wolof, Hausa, Mixteco, Nahuatl, K'iche' and Kichwa. Mental Health for ALL alone lists 10. We ran the same scan across the 25 case studies Hager Sharp and Crosby publish between them: 3 name any language at all, and none names more than two. Your services page says "30+ languages"; your homepage carries "Multicultural + Multilingual" as one of six tiles. A buyer comparing the four side by side would see one firm with a genuinely uncontested claim printing it in a field beneath the fold of a campaign page, while Rescue opens its Work page with three claims set in large type — "22+ years of experience", "Campaigns reaching over 170 million Americans", "175+ campaigns created" — and Rescue's clients page states, "In our nearly 20 years of behavior change marketing, we have never lost an existing client to another agency. Not once."